Actions

do the things https://actionprojects.github.io/Actions/

View on GitHub

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA

NICHOLAS D’ARTAGNAN DUMAS CIVIL ACTION v. FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION, ET AL

NO. 20-2965 c/w 20-2966

On the eve of the 2020 presidential election…

Judge assumes the wrong election; primarily, 538 votes are at matter here. “Federal Presidential Election”

filed two election-related complaints

note the PDF’s “Required” by the court do not allow for enough room to list defendants -> needs new page creation.

impracticable remedies

Trumps capaign had a victory in PA
Trump has filed on Nov. 6th

100,000,000 Americans have already voted

This is inconsequential
“Federal Presidential Election” Disputes to be handled by Dec. 8th 2020

largely incomprehensible

“intended to be amended & addended”

he appears to assert

Judge doesn’t understand the assertion & dismisses anyhow.

a broad array of American entities have combined to disenfranchise homeless individuals who lack a physical address.

“have combined” how is that interpreted; these entities follow some similar rule? Did I say ‘homeless’? (i hope not)

Maybe, Rules from FinCEN & the Patriot Act - anti-Money Laundering?

prompt sua sponte

Failed; maybe instead of looking to attack the argument, as a Judge, should be looking to interpret the issue. your latin majik words failed you.

standing to pursue claims in federal court. injury

pics actual, iminent

December 14th

causal connection

A :: B

likely … injury ‘redressed by a favorable decision.’

Dumas’s complaints do not establish any of these indispensable elements

They set the foundation; investigation to discovery. “intended to be amended & addended” see… NOPD has my hardware

personally has suffered

Amicus Curae + me… where is your Liberal Construction, in your sua sponte?

Dumas does not state with any particularity or precision how the collective actions of the diverse group of entities he has sued have caused any injury he has suffered

Whatever the merits of Dumas’s causes of action “I was asked to lie at multiple DMV’s” let’s start with that.

barred from rendering advisory opinions

I’m not looking for advice; or, your opinion; I’m addressing a complaint to the court.

free-wheeling

yet, another, opinion.

#ln115 U.S. CONST. art. II, § 1

please cite where it allots states jurisdiction over presidential qualifications
-> it allots a measured number of electoral candidates and their restrictions.
Constitutional Addendums 12th, 20th, 25th provide no jurisdiction to the states for eligibility.

Presidential Eligibility is 35yrs, 14yrs Resident, Born a Citizen. ‘Candidate must have a domain name owned webpage’
~ CA SoS

Electoral College Candidates are the only requirement one may need to ensure are fulfilled. The issues being ‘addressed’ are “Residence” and Voting Access; along with a littany of other access to services including failed delivery of IRS Stimulus.

B. Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment?

This is an effective limitation. Like all state laws, those regulating voting for presidential electors cannot impose discriminations which deny equal protection of the laws.

~ which source … in support.md

Challenges to the ORDER: