intended to be amended & addended

filing under organization at https://github.com/ActionProjects/Actions

filed in LAED NO. 20-2965 c/w 20-2966

• Dismissal Order
• response

Issues Under:

• intended to be amended & addended
  • Issues Under
    • RICO Act
    • False Claims Act
    • 1st Amendment
    • 4th Amendment
    • 5th & 15th Amendments
    • 6th Amendment
    • 8th Amendment
    • 9th Amendment
    • 12th Amendment vs. 17th
    • 13th & 16th Amendments
    • 15th, & 26th Amendments
    • Access to Courts
    • Access to LAW (legel opinions, ruling, filings, etc…)
  • Injunction
  • Residence
    • - Federal Elections Commission
    • - FinCEN (Banner Bank, Mechanics Bank, Wells Fargo, Bank of America)
    • - USPS (PostNet, UPS)
    • - DMV
  • 2018
  • 2019
  • 2020
  • Presidency
    • RON
  • entities
    • LAED
      • Clerks
      • Judge
    • SCOTUS
    • Address Required

Injunction - Federal, Presidential Election

Issues Under

RICO Act

False Claims Act

1st Amendment

Infringment on Campaign & Artistic Displays

4th Amendment

unreasonable searches and seizures

5th & 15th Amendments

Due Process

6th Amendment

Right to know accusers (NOPD, LAState Troopers, Parking, SPCA)

8th Amendment

imposing excessive bail, excessive fines, or cruel and unusual punishments.

9th Amendment

specific enumerations

12th Amendment vs. 17th

Presidential Election Process -> Electoral vs. Direct

13th & 16th Amendments

income tax is slavery

15th, & 26th Amendments

Resident Travelers issues

Access to Courts

https://www.law.cornell.edu/constitution-conan/article-4/section-2/clause-1/access-to-courts

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Freedom_of_movement ~ Paul v. Virginia, 75 U.S. 168 (1869)

http://www.laed.uscourts.gov/case-information/orders-citing-internet-resources

Access to LAW (legel opinions, ruling, filings, etc…)

Injunction

I Nicholas D’Artagnan Dumas demand an injunction on the 2020 Federal Presidential Election; predicated upon unfair practices by Federal and State Agencies.

Residence

• ANIMUS MANENDI. The intention of remaining

 RESIDENCE. The place of one's domicil. (q.v.) There is a difference between a man's residence and his domicil. He may have his domicil in Philadelphia, and still he may have a residence in New York; for although a man can have but one domicil, he may have several residences. A residence is generally transient in its nature, it becomes a domicil when it is taken up animo manendi. Roberts; Ecc. R. 75.
2. Residence is prima facie evidence of national character, but this may at all times be explained. When it is for a special purpose and transient in its nature, it does not destroy the national character. *~ West's Encyclopedia of American Law, edition 2. S.v. "residence." Retrieved November 2 2020 from [https://legal-dictionary.thefreedictionary.com/Residence](https://legal-dictionary.thefreedictionary.com/Residence)*

The following institutions failed to provide services based upon, what appears to be, a Patriot Act stipulation for a Physical Residence Address:

- Federal Elections Commission

• lack of support for multi-state transient resident voters (eg: vacationers)
• webForms

- FinCEN (Banner Bank, Mechanics Bank, Wells Fargo, Bank of America)

• bank account (checking, savings, CD, Safety Deposit Box)

- USPS (PostNet, UPS)

• private mail delivery ref:CAEDcase

- DMV

• form{??}ref:CAEDcase

• IRS

  • webform
    • inability to input 4

• EDD

  • webform application

• Blood Bank

• +others

2018

I, Nicholas D’Artagnan Dumas, was asked to lie, at multiple DMV’s and Banks, about my Residence Address while being a ‘Resident in Transience;’ with no, permitted, Physical Residence Address; barring the ability to: receive private mail; open a bank account / safety deposit box; file for unemployment; receive stimulus; register, timely and properly, with the FEC; contribute to the CENSUS;

2019

2020

Traveling individuals, while residents, without specific residential street addresses are barred from participating in the elections due to inadequate state implementations.

Presidency

9 States bar Write-in candidates. The SCOTUS decision further undermines the separation of powers.

Electoral College SCOTUS decision

RON

• individual complaints

FEC requires a “Physical Residence Address” Barring Nicholas D’Artagnan Dumas from registering timely. Nicholas D’Artagnan Dumas FEC reg Nicholas D’Artagnan Dumas announced candidacy to the El Dorado County HOTeam in 2018 at Safeway, in Placerville, California.

entities

LAED

• Deficiencies
  • ADDRESS
  • Electronic Signature Issues -> Document Submissions

Clerks

• document service timeliness failure
• e-signature representation
• citations

Judge

• Dismisses Order
  • ‘eve of election’ #citeline #todo+todo -> Fails to recognize actual election.
• Jurisdiction
  • to be established on individual merits
• Impracticable - (ref2Scotus?)
  • NV Docket “Stokke et al v. Cegavske et al, 2:20-cv-02046-DJA”
  • PA
  • 
• Federally Recognized, PLATT Map-less ≠ Residenceless, Homeless, Shelterless, etc…

SCOTUS

• Electoral College Decision
  • minimal argument representation
    • fails to submit to record ‘separation of powers’
      • intention of E.C. vs. “points system”
  • Recusal from case

Address Required

• LAED, DMV, IRS, EDD, voterRegistration
  • “where you sleep”
    • https://web.archive.org/web/20201108040308/https://www.huffpost.com/entry/voting-and-homeless_b_5533134
      • getting cleared out of locations
      • frequent change of location
  • voterReg into the matrices
  • voting access = paramount to court access - chusing [sic] judges.
  • Candidate Registration
    • FEC